📖 🚲 · 🅒 Ⓒ

Insights

Groupset

Each participants strategy to face the climbs and flats lies here.

Based on the 178 setups we documented, of 200 entrants; the other 22 have no record.

Groupset brand

4 setups have no groupset recorded.

Fixed-gear bikes are counted separately, in a section of their own.

The two giants take almost the whole field, everything else is a deliberate choice.

Groupset model

Mixed builds are logged as the rider assembled them.

Electronic vs Mechanical

47%

80 of 172 riders

  • Electronic 80 · 47%
  • Mechanical 92 · 53%

Electronic shifting means more comfort with the risk brought by batteries. For a 1500km race, this is worth a thought.

Electronic share by brand

SRAM 93% 42/45
Shimano 29% 36/123

Gearing, ratio by ratio

  • 1x 41 · 25%
  • 2x 120 · 74%
  • 3x 1 · 1%

73 distinct configurations across 162 riders.

Groupset ratios fall into 4 quadrants, split at 4.1 and 1.0: Top Left: Hard to climb, and hard to go fast Top Right: Hard to climb, but fast in the flats Bottom Left: Easier climbing, but lower top speeds Bottom Right: Easy climbing and high top speeds — the sweet spot

One bubble per chainring–sprocket configuration, sized by how many riders ran it. Right is a taller top gear; down is an easier climbing gear, since the climbing ratio is the small ring over the big sprocket.

Most common configurations

50-34 | 11-34 — 16 riders, the single most common.

Chainrings and cassette, exactly as they were run.

The Fixed-Gear Riders

3 rode fixed

One gear for the whole 1500 km. Nothing to shift, and the gears keep spinning. They exist outside of the graphs.

  • 1x 41 · 25%
  • 2x 120 · 73%
  • 3x 1 · 1%
  • Fixed gear 3 · 2%

3 fixed-gear setups against 162 geared ones. Nothing sits between them, and they exist far out in the top left field.